Santana: No Civilian Oversight Over Police Is Better Than Faux Oversight

Print More

When political leaders don’t want to lead, they propose to study.

It’s the ultimate stall tactic and usually quite effective in buying time, if not burying sticky issues altogether.

But the stall often comes with a hefty price tag.

Following a 3-2 vote by county supervisors earlier this month, taxpayers get to spend $120,000 for the rest of this year (keep in mind that November and December are no-work months in government) to have Los Angeles-based consultant Mike Gennaco tell us whether the work of his side business – OIR Group – has any value and whether OIR should be replaced by another model of oversight here in Orange County.

In short, Orange County taxpayers this year get to dole out nearly $30,000 every month for the remainder of this year to keep up the fantasy that county leaders are interested in heightening civilian oversight over law enforcement.

They are not.

They will not.

This is all just a pretty bullshit ballet…with a $120,000 bar tab.

Gennaco’s colleague and business partner, Steve Connolly, has been in hot water here ever since his contract began back in 2008 after the jail killing of John Derek Chamberlain.

I virtually witnessed the birth of OIR watching my then-colleague Tony Saavedra of the Orange County Register interview then-County Supervisor John Moorlach about the killing and what government leaders were doing about it.

Moorlach – whether knowingly or unknowingly – made the wisest and most interesting decision in the murder’s aftermath calling on his then-chief of staff Mario Mainero to immediately head down to the jail and see what was happening.

That made all the difference in the world.

Mainero, now a law professor at Chapman University, saw numerous irregularities and acted as a good citizen, a good Catholic, and reported what he saw regardless of political fallout.

That forced change.

That’s civilian oversight.

They’re called elected officials, who have the strength of character to do their job – especially when it’s a tough one.

But then Moorlach overstepped.

Faced with reporters’ questions about what the government was doing, he ignored his conservative ideology and decided to create an entire new government department because of one scandal.

Moorlach leaned on what most politicians do – adding staff – when confronted with a tough policy challenge.

Meet the Office of Independent Review.

Ironically, today it’s State Sen. Moorlach who is leading a fascinating charge against Caltrans’ bloated bureaucracy.

Yet back in 2008, Orange County supervisors were embarrassed by the revelations from the Chamberlain murder – of deputies watching videos while an inmate was beaten to death – and they trotted out OIR as a compromise.

As with most window-dressing reforms, supervisors allowed people to call OIR civilian review, which it is very much not.

Civilian review panels typically look deeply into use of force incidents in a very public manner and are bitterly opposed by most elected sheriffs and law enforcement unions.

OIR, in turn, allows departments to analyze their actions with an extra layer of analysis by the so-called independent assessment of OIR. These types of after-action analysis typically get more cooperation from departments because they don’t’ publicize what’s happening.

Indeed, the most interesting revelation during these past months of deliberations over OIR has come from Orange County Sheriff Sandra Hutchens, who has openly challenged county supervisors saying that she won’t cooperate with any of outside review of her department’s actions.

Hutchens likes the cozy relationship her department has with OIR. Moorlach also indicates that Connolly has helped solve countless issues inside the department that cannot be publicized.

Hutchens has been a staunch supporter of OIR, saying it’s virtually the only thing holding back a federal take over of Orange County jails – a contention that has obviously has enraged the Association of Orange County Deputy Sheriffs, the deputies union.

But lets remember one thing here.

It’s Los Angeles County – which had OIR and a civilian review board – that has a jail system undergoing a massive questioning.

That’s the same agency where Hutchens was a top commander before coming to Orange County.

And remember one last thing, in fairness to the work of Orange County Deputy Sheriffs.

There hasn’t been a visible jail beating scandal since Chamberlain in 2008.

Meanwhile, the civic center area in downtown Santa Ana with hundreds of homeless residents searching for help on the public grounds could desperately use a pair of social workers to work the area and help connect people to existing government programs.

That’s a much better use of $120,000.

  • gazoo

    Very well said…..looks like the BOS thinks the people of OC are dumb…. Doesnt take to much to see that this office is there to give the state and feds the idea that there is oversight when actually there is not… Window dressing….

  • Paul Lucas

    Excellent op-ed Norberto

    • Kathleen Tahilramani

      agree

  • David Zenger

    One of Moorlach’s favorite expressions: if you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it.

    The current system has no objective way of being measured because all of Connolly’s so-called accomplishments are of the evanescent, fuzzy, feel-good kind that are easily attributable to a better run department. Connolly is counsel to both the Sheriff AND the BoS, a sure-fire recipe for getting nothing done.

    The idea of contracting with Gennaco to fix the ridiculous situation his protege finds himself in after seven years is absurd. And to spend $27,000 a month to figure out what’s wrong with this picture by the same people who painted the picture, suggests gross incompetence.

    Here’s thought: since Hutchens wants a paper tiger in HER menagerie, let the cost come out of HER budget.

  • Jasenn Zaejian, Ph.D.

    Hutchin’s statement of refusal to cooperate with any outside review is a symptom that belies the truth of OIR programs or proposals. Even though her rhetoric appears to be supportive of citizen reviews. What is needed are body cameras that cannot be turned off, worn by all police and corrections officers interacting with the public and or incarcerated individuals; stiff penalties for failure to wear a body camera, and a truly independent citizens council with subpeona powers, that has immediate access to all police video footage in the Cloud..independent from any government or public official or those having sympathies with public and/or police officials, not a euphemism called OIR.