Court Hearing on Pot Shop Raid Video Continued to Aug. 13

A court hearing to consider a temporary restraining order on a video showing Santa Ana police officers misbehaving during a raid of a marijuana dispensary was continued to next Thursday to give attorneys for the city of Santa Ana more time to respond.

Three officers with the Santa Ana Police Department claim they would suffer “irreparable harm” if the department is allowed to use video that the Santa Ana Police Association argues was obtained in an illegal eavesdropping operation.

The video in question was recorded during a May raid of Sky High Collective, a medical marijuana store that city officials say was operating illegally.

The request was assigned to Superior Court Judge Ronald Bauer when it was filed Tuesday morning, but Bauer has gone on vacation and won’t be returning until next week.

Judge William Claster, who took up the matter in Bauer’s absence, was skeptical of the officers’ request at a brief hearing Wednesday morning.

Corey Glave, the attorney for the officers, argued that the video should not be used against officers in the investigation because it was recorded without their knowledge or consent.

Although he did not make a decision Wednesday, Claster was not convinced that the video has caused irreparable harm just based on the fact that an investigation has been opened. He said there is a difference between illegally obtained evidence that initiates an investigation, and the use of that evidence in trial.

“What you’re really asking me to do is enjoin an investigation from going forward…when it’s not clear what’s going to come out of it,” Claster said.

Given that the city of Santa Ana received request for the temporary restraining order Tuesday morning, Claster opted to continue the hearing until next Thursday, when Bauer returns from his vacation, to give the city more time to respond.

According to Glave, two rounds of interviews have been completed as part of the investigation into officers’ conduct during the raid.

The next hearing will take place Aug. 13 at 1:30pm in courtroom CX103.

Correction: Due to a reporting error, an earlier version of this story referred to a “tentative ruling” by Judge Ronald Bauer on the request for a temporary restraining order. Bauer has not issued any ruling and will take up the request for the first time next week. 

Contact Thy Vo at or follow her on Twitter @thyanhvo.

  • the sad truth this request brings to light; if there was no video, it is assumed by the union lawyers that the “good” cops would lie to protect the bad cops.

  • webweave

    Is it legal for cops to dismantle security cameras or eat pot on the job? Why should they receive protection committing illegal acts?

  • Seatired

    If the cops were wearing body cams, the cameras of every officer in the shop would have malfunctioned or they would have forgotten to turn them on. These cops are absolute scumbags. They are the “bad cops” and the “good cops” have done nothing to speak out against them.

  • Paul Lucas

    Bauer was probably hoping his ruling would stand and survive before he got back from vacation.

  • guest

    Can you post a copy of the tnetative decision. I want to see the judges reasons.

  • Irwin Lizarzaburu

    “Recorded without their knowledge or consent?? So this means if I catch a cop murdering someone with my iPhone camera, it’s not submittable because he didn’t know I was recording him? It’s like wiping your ass before you shit, just makes no damn sense!

  • Pingback: Santa Ana Cops: Don’t Harsh My (Recorded) Buzz; Quash the Video Instead! | Orange Juice Blog()