Blancato and Hagler: Keep Congress in Charge of Medicare

December 7th marks the end of the 2017 Medicare open enrollment period. The goal of open enrollment is for Medicare beneficiaries to be able to choose the best possible plan for their needs. The United States Senate has its own opportunity to help promote greater choice for older adults in Medicare by joining the House in voting to repeal the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB).

IPAB was included as a last-minute addition to the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in 2010. It would establish a 15-member commission all appointed by the President and vested with the responsibility to make arbitrary reductions in Medicare. These changes would be mandatory and would automatically become law unless Congress passed legislation by a two-thirds majority to make equivalent cuts.

IPAB’s inherent danger exists in both its composition and its mission. Appointees would not be subject to Senate confirmation and there would be no guarantee of consumer representation. Further, we don’t even know who these people will be—the president isn’t required to name members until Medicare spending reaches a certain threshold, triggering IPAB.

IPAB would not only make recommendations for cuts – it would also be required to implement these spending cuts rapidly, perhaps within a year. This could lead to payment cuts to providers and could exacerbate the current problem of physicians, particularly specialists, not accepting new Medicare patients.

Half of Medicare beneficiaries earn less than $23,500 a year, or just twice the poverty limit, according to Census figures. Any cuts to Medicare or program coverage limits would have a dire impact on these vulnerable seniors who are dependent on Medicare and other programs for assistance.

The work of IPAB would result in Congress abdicating its more than 50-year responsibility in setting Medicare policy. Passing this responsibility to a small group of unelected and unaccountable individuals is unfair and dangerous to the future of Medicare and those it serves.

The opportunity exists to repeal IPAB before it is ever convened. The Senate could join the House and pass a bipartisan bill, H.R. 849, to repeal IPAB immediately. Or, there is already bipartisan legislation pending in the Senate on IPAB repeal which could be considered. One of these bills is sponsored by Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX); the other bill is sponsored by Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR). Clearly, this issue transcends the partisanship often associated with the ACA.

A vote on IPAB repeal could happen in December in the Senate. A separate bipartisan vote was taken by Congress to prevent any funds to be spent to establish IPAB. It is time to take the ultimate step and repeal IPAB once and for all.

As advocates for older adults both in San Diego and nationally, we work to protect beneficiary access to the essential care and services provided by Medicare. There are ways to improve the health care system and strengthen Medicare’s solvency at the same time – using more electronic health records, providing more innovations in delivery systems and treatments, and focusing more on outcomes. Some of the reforms in the ACA have already accomplished this. IPAB would set us back and possibly introduce rationing of care and services for the first time in Medicare’s history.

It’s a safe assumption that many older Americans who depend on Medicare have no idea about the cuts Medicare will be facing. It’s an even safer assumption that once IPAB-related cuts impact them, these seniors will be angry. After all, 89 percent of seniors want Congress and President Trump to “keep the promise and integrity of Medicare without cuts to the program,” according to a 2016 Morning Consult poll. The same poll found that only 9 percent of seniors think that “government officials should be able to make changes to Medicare without the approval of Congress.”

We call on Senators Feinstein and Harris, both dedicated supporters of Medicare and those it serves, to support IPAB repeal and keep the job of Medicare reform where it belongs—in Congress.

Blancato is Executive Director of the National Association of Nutrition and Aging Services Programs (NANASP) based in Washington DC and Board Chair of the American Society on Aging.   Hagler is the CEO of Anaheim-based SeniorServ, president of Meals on Wheels California, co-chair of the Orange County Aging Services Collaborative and board member and president elect of NANASP (National Association of Nutrition and Aging Services Programs).

Opinions expressed in editorials belong to the authors and not Voice of OC.

Voice of OC is interested in hearing different perspectives and voices. If you want to weigh in on this issue or others please contact Voice of OC Involvement Editor Theresa Sears at TSears@voiceofoc.org

  • frustrated

    Are we going to get to keep our healthcare or not?

  • LFOldTimer

    Let’s see. If I recall correctly in 2010 the Democrats controlled both the House and the Senate and, of course, Obama was President.

    It’s a shame that the Democrats established the IPAB, as a matter of legislative law – putting the lower income old people behind the eight ball.

    And I thought the Democrats were champions for the old and the poor. My bad.

    Well, at least now that we have a GOP controlled congress it appears Republican electeds are moving in the direction of a IPAB repeal.

    Let’s hope it all works out.