Council members approved a change to the city’s zoning law that could allow a nature park on the Oak Creek golf course site, which might also get thousands of new homes.
Tag: 1988 Irvine Open Space Initiative
Irvine’s Oak Creek Development Could See Nature Park
Irvine planning commissioners are recommending that city council members adopt a zone change that would allow for a nature park on the current Oak Creek Golf Course site.
Egorov: Oak Creek, Understanding Irvine’s Protected Open Space and Its Legal Status
Oak Creek Golf Course is legally protected under Resolution 88-1, despite claims otherwise. Residents should understand the facts, examine official maps, and support recording a public easement to secure Irvine’s open space for future generations.”
Irvine Open Space Protection Ballot Measure Kicked to 2026
After initiating a debate about the future of open space preservation in town, the city council decided to delay any further discussion about a special election to 2026.
Van Tuyl: Irvine Ballot Measures and Why We Are Talking About Them
Irvine’s debate over the Oak Creek Golf Course is fueled by claims it’s “protected open space” under Resolution 88-1. It isn’t. As the City weighs five ballot measures, voters must decide between misinformation and documented law — and whether preservation should be built on facts or slogans.
Irvine Grapples With Open Space Protections
Irvine City Council members are expected to discuss four different ballot measure options regarding the future of open space preservation in town and whether or not the Oak Creek Golf Club can be replaced with housing.
Stockstill: Open Space in Irvine, Will 1988 Promises Be Kept in 2025?
In 1988 Irvine voters enshrined a deal between the city and Irvine Company setting aside various parcels of land for permanent open space in return for intensified development elsewhere.
No one thought much about this until a proposal to build a new village at Oak Creek Golf Course was raised. Many people pointed out the obvious–Oak Creek was one of the open space areas protected by the 1988 vote. The council has been grappling with how to reconcile the need for more housing with the public vote requirement (which the city attorney says may not actually be necessary).



