This tumultuous year has proven the essential nature of nonpartisan local news. Every day we bring you news critical to staying informed and active in the community. Join us with a tax-deductible donation.
Following intense criticism from fellow Republicans, Orange County Supervisor Shawn Nelson on Tuesday opted to put off his controversial proposal to extend supervisors’ term limits.
Nelson’s proposal, which would allow him to serve up to 12 extra years on the board, was met with harsh criticism after he unveiled it last week.
Nelson had scheduled a supervisors’ vote Tuesday to put the issue before voters in November. But after it became clear he didn’t have the three-vote majority needed to get the item approved Tuesday, he postponed it until the board’s next meeting, on July 26.
It remains unclear whether he will be able garner enough support among his colleagues to get the issue approved for the November ballot. Two of his fellow supervisors – Todd Spitzer and Michelle Steel – have publicly opposed the measure, meaning he needs support from both Chairwoman Lisa Bartlett and Supervisor Andrew Do. Do was absent from Tuesday’s meeting.
There are two more supervisors’ meetings left before the deadline to get the measure on the November ballot, according to Spitzer.
Nelson argues that the term limits extension, from two four-year terms to three four-year terms, is prudent because it takes years for supervisors to get up to speed in understanding the complexities of county government and policy.
But the proposal has drawn intense opposition from prominent local Republicans.
Spitzer called it “rushed” and “completely self-serving,” and GOP activist Jon Fleischman railed against the proposal in an online post.
Nelson didn’t comment on his proposal Tuesday, nor did any of the other supervisors. But Fleischman did weigh in during public comments, after waiting about three hours to speak.
“Term limits exist because we fundamentally believe that citizens should run their government, and that people should come” and serve the public for a short period before returning to live under the rules they promulgated, Fleischman said.
Nelson’s proposal also misleads voters by asking them to approve a three-term limit, while leaving out the fact that there’s currently a two-term limit, Fleishman said.
“We very much oppose it,” Fleischman said, calling the measure “deceptive and misleading.”
Nick Gerda covers county government and Santa Ana for Voice of OC. He can be reached at email@example.com.