Coastal Commission Staff Report Eliminates All Public Benefits, Coastal Access, Open Space, Native American Programs

The following is a press release from an organization unaffiliated with Voice of OC. The views expressed here are not those of Voice of OC


Newport Banning Ranch Owners Say Coastal Commission Staff Report is “De-facto Denial” of Project–Eliminates All Public Benefits, Coastal Access, Open Space, Native American Programs

Vows to Challenge Report Because of False Assumptions on Impacts Commission Staff Relied Almost Solely on Data from Project Opponents

PR Newswire

NEWPORT BEACH, Calif., Aug. 29, 2016

NEWPORT BEACH, Calif., Aug. 29, 2016 /PRNewswire/ — Saying the most recent California Coastal Commission staff report is a “de-facto denial of the project,” Newport Banning Ranch property owners say they will challenge the report’s conclusions which are mostly based on false assumptions provided by experts representing project opponents.

The 172 page staff recommendation released late Friday would allow development on less than 10 acres of the 401 acre property, essentially killing the project which proposed using approximately 70 acres for homes and commercial uses and permanently preserving about 300 acres for natural open space, hiking and biking trials, and nature and Native American educational programming.

“We negotiated in good faith for four years and believed we had reached a compromise that met environmental regulations and economic realities,” said Michael Mohler, Senior Project Manager for Newport Banning Ranch. “We are deeply troubled that staff wants to eliminate all proposed visitor serving programs and favors keeping a fence in perpetuity that blocks coastal access to the public and, in particular, under-served neighbors in Westside Costa Mesa.”

“We have invested years and spent millions on planning, engineering, and working with Coastal Commission staff,” said Mohler. “Our proposed plan is based on over 20 years of site research, provides appropriate habitat for the one burrowing owl that has appeared on the site for no more than three to four weeks annually. This is a de-facto denial of the project that will result in the oil field remaining in place for decades to come.”

Mohler added Newport Banning Ranch’s conservation plan not only provides habitat for the burrowing owl, but is a multi-species protection plan that restores the natural flora and fauna of the coastline. The site is currently a degraded industrial brownfield from years of oil exploration and drilling.

“We have done everything asked of us over the past decade to meet or exceed all requirements,” Mohler added. “This is only one issue in the Staff Report that needs to be addressed.  We have worked in good faith to respond to direction received from the Coastal Commission in October last year, and overcome the obstacles placed in our path to do the right thing.  We will continue to advocate for the accelerated abandonment and remediation of the oil field and creation of more than 300 acres of public open space that would result from implementing our proposed plan.”

A vote by the Commission on the project is scheduled for Sept. 7 in Newport Beach.

About Newport Banning Ranch

Newport Banning Ranch proposes permanent preservation of 80% of the property (about 300+ acres) and creating 20% housing and commercial (about 70 acres) of the 401 acre property. The money from this limited development (895 housing units and a 75-room hotel, 20-bed hostel and a small 45,100 sq. ft. neighborhood/visitor-serving retail center) effort will establish funding for the Newport Banning Land Trust and its restoration and educational activities, including community parks and recreation areas, an nature and Native American education center and 7 miles of hiking and biking trails.

The project is endorsed by many elected and community leaders as well as the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians (Kizh Nation) and Tongva Ancestral Territorial Tribal Nation (TATTN).

Contact: Adam Alberti
Office: 415.227.9700
Cell: 415.225.2443

SOURCE Newport Banning Ranch

Voice of OC posts press releases to provide readers with information directly from organizations. We do not edit or rewrite press releases, and encourage readers to contact the originator of a given release for more information. To submit a press release email

  • The developer’s press release complains that they have worked closely
    with CCC and spent millions, only to be given a de-facto denial.

    Of course the staff report is highly critical and protective of Banning Ranch. It is a very important last stand for coastal native habitat, as well as a potential nature preserve.

    And it cannot reach its full potential and provide the conditions for nature to do her best over time and us to experience such fundamentals of life if fragmented by development.

    This is the issue, not NBR’s negotiations, costs, slighted feelings, legal maneuverings or other games of which there have been too many to count. At this point in time, when development of all kinds has filled southern California, it is no small issue to ask agencies to truly protect such
    rare wild places.

    The staff of the Coastal Commission has acted correctly in standing strong against short term profits of a few over the immensely long term benefits of balance with the natural world.