The San Clemente City Council Tuesday unanimously approved a 2019-20 budget that would add two patrol deputies and one patrol vehicle to the city’s police force, but residents expressed frustration that the additions were not included in the staff report posted online by the city. 

Residents in the audience voiced concerns about the budget item not being made public to them until the meeting, and some cited possible Brown Act violations committed by the city. Public commenters called for transparency on the dais. The Brown Act is California’s government open meeting law.

The Brown Act does not require that documents to be acted on by the council be posted on the agency’s homepage, said Terry Francke, an expert on government transparency laws for Cal Aware and Voice of OC’s legal advisor on government meetings and public information.

“If there is action to be taken approving the contents of the documents, that action should be disclosed as part of the agenda that’s posted,” Francke said.

The city’s proposed budget was made available online to residents prior to the meeting, and the discussion item was included on the meeting agenda.

A staff presentation that discussed the additional deputies and patrol vehicle, as well as the city’s contract with the Orange County Sheriff’s Department, were not made available online, but were printed and handed out at residents’ request during the meeting.

City staff distributes copies of the proposed 2019-20 San Clemente city budget that were copied during the June 4, 2019 City Council meeting. Credit: MIRANDA ANDRADE, Voice of OC

City attorney Scott Smith said that the city and staff had not committed a Brown Act violation because the staff presentation was considered a disclosable public record under government code.  

“This [presentation] was made available to council in visual form on the same base that it was made available to the public, so printing and distributing it is above and beyond the requirement.” Smith said.

It is unclear why the two full-time positions and patrol vehicle were left off the staff report. 

“If this wasn’t a Brown Act violation the way the city attorney [said]…we [still] have a transparency policy in this city, [these documents] should have been provided to us, they should have been online…” A resident who declined to give his name said during public comments. “We were blindsided tonight. That should never happen to the citizenship here, the council owes us more.”

The final contract with OCSD, including the additional deputies and vehicle, will be brought back to the agenda during city council’s next meeting June 18.

Miranda Andrade is an apprentice reporter with Voice of OC, she can be reached at

Since you've made it this far,

You are obviously connected to your community and value good journalism. As an independent and local nonprofit, our news is accessible to all, regardless of what they can afford. Our newsroom centers on Orange County’s civic and cultural life, not ad-driven clickbait. Our reporters hold powerful interests accountable to protect your quality of life. But it’s not free to produce. It depends on donors like you.

Join the conversation: In lieu of comments, we encourage readers to engage with us across a variety of mediums. Join our Facebook discussion. Message us via our website or staff page. Send us a secure tip. Share your thoughts in a community opinion piece.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *